check this out

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:25 pm

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911security.html

sharkmansix · Post by **sharkmansix** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:03 pm

Yeah, whatreallyhappened.com is full of BS. The owner Michael Rivero also believes this:

Rivero's focused support of free speech with regard to holocaust denial[2] and his claims that Zionists acting on behalf of the state of Israel are behind many major terrorist incidents[3][4] and Rivero's labeling of suspected Israeli spying on the government of the United States as the “Mother of All Scandals”[5] have led to accusations of anti-Semitism against him by his critics,[6] to whom he replies using a quote attributed to Colin Powell pointing out that criticizing Israel's government policies is not itself anti-Semitic.

From:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Rivero

Yeah, he's trustworthy.

bassjones · Post by **bassjones** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 1:45 am

Max, you're starting to freak me out with all this conspiracy nonsense. I hope we don't find you in a cabin in Montana 20 years from now, reaking of B.O. and feces, hair down to your shoulders and beard down to your belt, ranting about space aliens and some secret government program to cover up UFO sightings...

heaven's chimney · Post by **heaven's chimney** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 2:33 pm

sharkmansix wrote:Yeah, he's trustworthy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Bassjones: I'm pretty confident that you're talking about Ted Kazwhatty, aka The Unabomber. I would have to ask you how he was crazy and whacky (in other words: wrong) like you purport.

Grindspine · Post by **Grindspine** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 3:14 pm

sharkmansix wrote:Yeah, whatreallyhappened.com is full of BS. The owner Michael Rivero also believes this:

Rivero's focused support of free speech with regard to holocaust denial[2] and his claims that Zionists acting on behalf of the state of Israel are behind many major terrorist incidents[3][4] and Rivero's labeling of suspected Israeli spying on the government of the United States as the “Mother of All Scandals”[5] have led to accusations of anti-Semitism against him by his critics,[6] to whom he replies using a quote attributed to Colin Powell pointing out that criticizing Israel's government policies is not itself anti-Semitic.
From:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Rivero

Yeah, he's trustworthy.

Are you saying that Israel isn't responsible for any acts of terrorism?????????????????????????????

sharkmansix · Post by **sharkmansix** » Sat Jul 22, 2006 7:22 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

He's not only the messenger he's the composer. I'm not attacking him, I'm questioning his stance on other positions. I'm not just going to look at what someone is doing, I'm also going to look into their past.

That's why I trust John Stewart for my news; I know his work.

Are you saying that Israel isn't responsible for any acts of terrorism?????????????????????????????

No. I'm questioning his stance on Isreal spying on the US and his position on holocaust denial.

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:28 pm

As Black points out, "when you [a company] have a security contract, you know the inner workings of everything." And if another company is linked with the security company, then "What's on your computer is on their computer[/quote]

,,,yea its kinda like that in reality

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:37 pm

the only evidence that was ever proposed to americans about who was responsible for the terrorist attacks on 911..was the "bin laden confession tape"

who ever was in that video was writing a letter with their right hand.......this is easily identifiable as bogus because bin laden is left handed...the guy in the video doesnt even look like bin laden...however he does look middle -eastern..ill give him that.....

AMERICANS HAVE EVERY REASON TO BELIEVE OTHERWISE!!!!!!!

can you say voice morphing technology? how much $$ did we waste on that in previous years? and for what?

and now korea is gona blow our asses up cuz clinton gave them the technology....,yea prolly not tho really, since they cant even get a missle off the launch pad....but who knows?

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:18 pm

Powell was the subject of controversy in 2004 when, in a conversation with British Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, he reportedly referred to neocons within the Bush administration (Cheney, Rumsfeld and others) as "forking crazies"[12]. In addition to being reported in the press (though generally, the expletive was censored in the US press), the quote was used by James Naughtie in his book, "The Accidental American: Tony Blair and the Presidency", and by Chris Patten in his book, "Cousins and Strangers: America, Britain, and Europe in a new century".

Morphine Child · Post by **Morphine Child** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:03 am

I find the Kennedy assassination more intriguing. Or maybe Area 51.

Grindspine · Post by **Grindspine** » Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:42 am

Powell should have run for a presidency instead of working with the current administration...

I still say Stormin' Norman should have finished Baghdad off in the first desert storm instead of stopping short. Of course, that was a direction from the commander in chief at the time.

Feb 27, 1991 President Bush orders a cease fire effective at midnight Kuwaiti time.

Whoops... stopped too early! That's Bush Sr. by the way, not Dubya.

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:06 pm

The ABA report recommends, among other things, that Congress pass a law requiring the president to inform Congress in timely fashion of those parts of existing legislation he intends to ignore, and why. The report then poses the inevitable question: "Could a president, in a signing statement, disregard even this legislation?" This, the ABA explains, is "precisely what occurred in 2002" after Congress, exasperated by Bush's use of signing statements to withold all sorts of information that he was required by law to share with the legislative branch, passed a law requiring the attorney general to submit to Congress a detailed report of every instance in which he or any Justice Department official ignored these or any other legislative mandates.

[/quote]

Myrddin · Post by **Myrddin** » Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:21 pm

Grindspine wrote:Powell should have run for a presidency instead of working with the current administration...

I still say Stormin' Norman should have finished Baghdad off in the first desert storm instead of stopping short. Of course, that was a direction from the commander in chief at the time.

Feb 27, 1991 President Bush orders a cease fire effective at midnight Kuwaiti time.
Whoops... stopped too early! That's Bush Sr. by the way, not Dubya.

He was afraid to be in the position we now find ourselves. With 2500+ Americans killed, with another 18,700 + wounded. As well as another 300+ killed in Afghanistan.

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:14 pm

amen brotha

DELETED · Post by **DELETED** » Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:12 pm

DELETED