Why Can't I Own a Canadian?

Garr · Post by **Garr** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:24 pm

Why Can't I Own a Canadian?
October 2002

Dr. Laura Schlessinger is a radio personality who dispenses advice to people who call in to her radio show. Recently, she said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22 and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following is an open letter to Dr. Laura penned by a east coast resident, which was posted on the Internet. It's funny, as well as informative:

Dear Dr. Laura:

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the other specific laws and how to follow them:

When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15:19- 24. The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination - Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?

Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? - Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

Your devoted fan,
Jim

MrSpall · Post by **MrSpall** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 8:22 pm

Sometimes Garr, you make me wanna kiss you.

Of course this would be expressly forbidden by Levitcus 18:22.

Garr · Post by **Garr** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 8:30 pm

If I'm wearing a dress, I look like a woman. Would that one be okay?

MrSpall · Post by **MrSpall** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 8:32 pm

I'm almost certain that you in a dress would be some sort of abomination as well.

Sankofa · Post by **Sankofa** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:54 pm

I remember having read this and find it no less entertaining the second go around.

Garr · Post by **Garr** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:00 pm

I'm sorry that you were not enter-lightened by it.

MrSpall · Post by **MrSpall** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:11 pm

Actually Garr - because of the double negative of 'no less' (see: http://www.fortwaynemusic.com/boards/vi ... c&start=50) I believe Mr. 'Kofa was saying that it was entertaining.

Al Quandt · Post by **Al Quandt** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:35 pm

yeah this was posted last year, i think by garr that time too.

farts.

Sankofa · Post by **Sankofa** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:58 pm

MrSpall wrote:Actually Garr - because of the double negative of 'no less' (see: http://www.fortwaynemusic.com/boards/vi ... c&start=50) I believe Mr. 'Kofa was saying that it was entertaining.

You're not wrong.

Garr · Post by **Garr** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:48 pm

I mis-read. . .

I have no excuse.

Garr · Post by **Garr** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:49 pm

kimaliz wrote:yeah this was posted last year, i think by garr that time too.

farts.

Are you serious? I don't remember posting or seeing this before. Sorry for the dupe, if it is my fault.

Al Quandt · Post by **Al Quandt** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:54 pm

Garr wrote:
kimaliz wrote:yeah this was posted last year, i think by garr that time too.

farts.
Are you serious? I don't remember liking dudes. Sorry for the hump, if it is my VD.

Garr · Post by **Garr** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 7:22 pm

Yeah, nice.

Yeah, cinnamon bits!

bassjones · Post by **bassjones** » Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:15 am

This was from at least 12 years ago. I don't think she even has a radio show anymore...

bassplayer92 · Post by **bassplayer92** » Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:39 pm

lol sounds lk sumthing my uncle would do