IS BIGFOOT REAL?

scuzzbagcomics · Post by **scuzzbagcomics** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 1:53 pm

AFTER HEARING A BIGFOOT GROANING AT ME FROM A SWAMP LATE ONE FOGGY NIGHT, I HAVE BEEN ASSURED OF THEIR EXISTENCE. THESE HAIRY HOMINIDS ARE VERY REAL AND CLOSER THAN WE WOULD EVER IMAGINE. THERE ARE BOUND TO BE PLENTY OF SKEPTICS, SO LET THOSE WHO HARBOR NO FEAR STEP FORTH.

JEDIGLIDE · Post by **JEDIGLIDE** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:55 pm

CHEWBACCA!!!!!!

Give,
Jedi Glide
Glide Productions
Midwest Flava Kingz

scuzzbagcomics · Post by **scuzzbagcomics** » Sat Feb 12, 2005 7:39 pm

jediglide said

CHEWBACCA!!!!!!

Uh...yeah...kinda. There are some similarities

But check out chewy's nose. Its more like a dog nose, while bigfoot's would be more similar to ours, or some other primate's.

agatha10 · Post by **agatha10** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 4:57 pm

that picture has been proven false, i saw something on tv about, and the tv never lies to me

heshsurprise · Post by **heshsurprise** » Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:25 am

no way...alex the amish dont watch TV...anyway all those mosters are real ie the loch ness, bigfoot, i believe in all of them

scuzzbagcomics · Post by **scuzzbagcomics** » Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:47 pm

AGATHA10 SAID...

that picture has been proven false, i saw something on tv about, and the tv never lies to me

NO, THAT IS A STILL FRAME FROM THE PATTERSON GIMLIN FILM SHOT OCT. 20 1967. THE FILM WAS PROOVED REAL BY LEADING SCIENTISTS, ANTHROPOLOGISTS, BIOMECHANICS ENGINEERS, AND SPECIAL EFFECTS/COSTUME EXPERTS. BULGING MUSCLES ARE VISIBLE IN THE FILM WHICH VISABLY ARE OBVIOUSLY PART OF A NONHUMAN BODY. SPECIAL EFFECTS EXPERTS SAID THAT SUCH A CLEVER HOAX IN 1967 WAS IMPOSSIBLE. THE TECHNOLOGY JUST WASN'T EXISTENT. ANTHROPOLOGISTS STUDIED THE PRINTS IT LEFT. IT HAD NATURAL RIDGE FLOW PATTERNS, UNLIKE ANY KNOWN ANIMALS. THE BIOMECHANICS EXPERTS SAID THAT THE KNEE JOINT ON THE CREATURE SWIVELLED OUTWARD AS IT WALKED. THEY SAID IT WOULD BE PHYSIOLOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR A HUMAN TO HAVE DONE THAT. ALL THIS PROOF AND MORE OF THE EXISTENCE OF BIGFOOT IS AVAILABLE OF THE VIDEO "SASQUATCH: LEGEND MEETS SCIENCE" , WHICH WAS A SPECIAL ON THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL.

CLICK HERE FOR INFO ABOUT THE VIDEO AND ITS EVIDENCE
http://www.bfro.net/LMS/LMS.asp

agatha10 · Post by **agatha10** » Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:35 pm

SUCH A CLEVER HOAX IN 1967 WAS IMPOSSIBLE.

of course it was possible, its called Planet of the Apes

Grindspine · Post by **Grindspine** » Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:55 pm

You be the judge.

Behind those logs, you don't see his skateboard.

agatha10 · Post by **agatha10** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:24 am

hahaha

scuzzbagcomics · Post by **scuzzbagcomics** » Thu Feb 17, 2005 1:32 pm

agatha10 said

of course it was possible, its called Planet of the Apes

I can assure you that the actors in the planet of the apes were still just as incapable as the rest of us at swiveling their knee joints as the bigfoot in the patterson-gimlin film does, which is a physiological impossibility for humans.

agatha10 · Post by **agatha10** » Sun Feb 20, 2005 12:00 am

alright well the only questions is, if the film is bonafide then where is mr. bigfoot? i mean is there a species? just one? if theres just one is it dead? and if it is a species why havent we found any? if they act like humans are they capable of creating buildings or cities or any other form that would resemble a working and living civilaztion? and if they are real and are so big, why are they scared of humans? why dont they try and become the top of the food chain? are they more animal or human? can they speak? do they rely on instinct or thoughts? just a couple questions

scuzzbagcomics · Post by **scuzzbagcomics** » Sun Feb 20, 2005 11:45 am

agatha10 said

alright well the only questions is, if the film is bonafide then where is mr. bigfoot? i mean is there a species? just one? if theres just one is it dead? and if it is a species why havent we found any? if they act like humans are they capable of creating buildings or cities or any other form that would resemble a working and living civilaztion? and if they are real and are so big, why are they scared of humans? why dont they try and become the top of the food chain? are they more animal or human? can they speak? do they rely on instinct or thoughts? just a couple questions

Sasquatches as a species of animal which are found all over North america wherever there are forests. There are believed to be many subspecies from region to region. There are many sightings all the time. Plus there are visuals all the time. Fall of 2003, several eyewitnesses saw a bigfoot running through a swamp in north webster. that sighting happened about 20 miles or so from my house, where i heard one groaning in a swamp.

some good sites with vast sighting databases...

www.bfro.net

www.indianabigfoot.com

There have been reports of people shooting bigfoot with guns, so they have good reason to avoid humans. but they can be very aggressive if you enter their territory, especially during spring or summer, when they may have young ones nearby. But there are not very many of them. They need large areas to subsist. since they are losing habitat, their populations are dwindling. they have always been reclusive animals and they are more active at night. since they have little habitat, they are always on the move. it is to be believed that their senses: hearing, smell are much more sensative than ours. so they can avoid us easily.

they dont build buildings, they take advantage of natural outposts, overhanging ledges, caves, downed logs. they have been known to make nests- large grass nests in prairie parts of ohio. as for whether they are more human or animal...they and their cousins the almas of mongolia, yeti of nepal, etc. are the only other bipedal primates other than ourselves. as for evolution, ther are really only 2 theories:

1. they are remnants of the neanderthals

2. (more supported) they are descendants of an ancient bipedal ape (Gigantopithecus) which lived in Asia at the same time as Homo Erectus

Gigantopithecus blacki was 10 feet tall and weighed 1,200 pounds

Here's a reconstrustion of a giganto for comparison...

If bigfoots are descended from gigantos, then they would be more closely related to orangutans, while scientists believe humans came from the chimpanzee/gorilla family.

as for language, witnesses have told about a chattering language that bigfoots use to communicate.

do they rely on instinct or thoughts?

no one has been able to study one that closely. some people have claimed that bigfoot can communicate telepathically with them, there have been many books written on the psychic sasquatch idea though. their observed behavior and manner has led many witnesses to say that they are more human-like than other animals, so they may be capable of thought. but living out in nature, they need instincts to survive.

Scrudge Bucket · Post by **Scrudge Bucket** » Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:09 pm

squirrels exist too... why arent you guys obsessed with squirrels or raccoons or something? why bigfoot?

agatha10 · Post by **agatha10** » Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:33 pm

good point

scuzzbagcomics · Post by **scuzzbagcomics** » Sun Feb 20, 2005 4:37 pm

squirrels? screw squirrels. you hit a squirrel and it gets pancaked. you hit a bigfoot, your ford escort gets totalled, and the bigfoot walks off into the forest, unharmed. that demands respect.

plus bigfoot's a lot more mysterious than squirrels.

so mysterious...