Strategy of Dalembert and counter-d'alembert
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 1:25 pm
Strategy of Dalembert and counter-d'alembert
Among financial betting strategies Dogon popular betterof uses the method of D'alembert and its variety - the counter-D'alamber. This method was initially used to play in the casino, but later clients of bookmakers https://www.pin-up.bet/ introduced it for betting on sports events.
If you compare d'alembert's betting strategy with martingale's method, then it has a significant plus. If in Martingale after losing the bet you need to multiply by 2 the size of the bet, then add here. Thus, the probability of Bank draining is significantly reduced.In this article we will look at this strategy and its variety and give examples of its use.
The essence of d'alembert's strategy
We will operate with such a concept as a unit to determine the size of the bet. Unit can be 10 rubles, 100, 200 and so on. The main thing to remember this value, to continue to build on it at the conclusion of the bet.
For betting strategies according to the method of d'alembert, you need to find the events with indexes from 3 to 4. It does not matter what kind of sport they will be. If we are talking about football, then most often such quotes are put up for a draw or a big or a small total.
The point is that the first bet is equal to one. Let's say it's 10 rubles. In the beginning it is better not to risk large sums, but to start with a minimum. Let the coefficient be 3.5.
If the bet is not played, the size of the next one is increased by 1 unit.
In our case, it will be equal to 20 rubles. If this bet will be lost, then again increase the size of the next bet by 1 unit. And so on. Let's say we got to step 8. The probability of losing 7 times in a row on bets with a coefficient of 3.5 is less than 25 %. Nevertheless, let's imagine that it happened. As a result, we spent the amount:
10+20+30+40+50+60+70=280 rubles.
The next rate will be 80 rubles. This means that a total of 360 rubles will be spent. If the bet plays with the coefficient 4, we will get a profit equal to 320 rubles. Taking away from 360 we get a loss of 40 rubles. But this is the most negative scenario when the bet will play on the 8th step. And this is a minor loss if the initial amount was 3% of the Bank.
Once we win the bet, the cycle ends and we go back to the original bet size.
As a rule, 4 iterations are enough to get a win, as we have events with coefficients no higher than 4. In this case, we will get such a deal:
1 bet-loss
2 bet-loss
3 bet-loss
4 bet-win
Let's say the final bet played with a coefficient of 3.5. In this case, we bet 40 rubles and won 140 rubles. Subtract from this value the previously set amount and get:
140 - 40 – 30- 20 - 10 = 40 rubles.
So we have put a 100 and got 40. Our profit was 40%. This is a very good indicator. If the coefficient on the last bet was 3, then the profit would be 20%, which is also good.
The advantage of this technique is that in the first 5 steps we make a profit. And on the following we will get the minimum loss, which is easily won back by the following bets.
The disadvantage of d'alembert's betting strategy is that there is a possibility of losing a small amount of money.
Counter-d'alembert system
The essence of this technique is that if you win the next bet increases by 1 unit, and if you lose – it decreases. If you lose the first bet, the size of the next one remains the same. This technique is good when the player wins at least 40% of bets.
The positive quality of this technique is the fact that in a series of losses bettor does not increase the size of the bet.
The disadvantage of the counter-Dalembert system is that it will not be possible to recoup in a short time after a series of 4-5 lost bets.
Summary
To check the effectiveness of each of the presented methods, some bettors act as follows. They divide the Bank for each strategy and put separately. After many bets, they compare the income and choose the most effective way for further use.
Among financial betting strategies Dogon popular betterof uses the method of D'alembert and its variety - the counter-D'alamber. This method was initially used to play in the casino, but later clients of bookmakers https://www.pin-up.bet/ introduced it for betting on sports events.
If you compare d'alembert's betting strategy with martingale's method, then it has a significant plus. If in Martingale after losing the bet you need to multiply by 2 the size of the bet, then add here. Thus, the probability of Bank draining is significantly reduced.In this article we will look at this strategy and its variety and give examples of its use.
The essence of d'alembert's strategy
We will operate with such a concept as a unit to determine the size of the bet. Unit can be 10 rubles, 100, 200 and so on. The main thing to remember this value, to continue to build on it at the conclusion of the bet.
For betting strategies according to the method of d'alembert, you need to find the events with indexes from 3 to 4. It does not matter what kind of sport they will be. If we are talking about football, then most often such quotes are put up for a draw or a big or a small total.
The point is that the first bet is equal to one. Let's say it's 10 rubles. In the beginning it is better not to risk large sums, but to start with a minimum. Let the coefficient be 3.5.
If the bet is not played, the size of the next one is increased by 1 unit.
In our case, it will be equal to 20 rubles. If this bet will be lost, then again increase the size of the next bet by 1 unit. And so on. Let's say we got to step 8. The probability of losing 7 times in a row on bets with a coefficient of 3.5 is less than 25 %. Nevertheless, let's imagine that it happened. As a result, we spent the amount:
10+20+30+40+50+60+70=280 rubles.
The next rate will be 80 rubles. This means that a total of 360 rubles will be spent. If the bet plays with the coefficient 4, we will get a profit equal to 320 rubles. Taking away from 360 we get a loss of 40 rubles. But this is the most negative scenario when the bet will play on the 8th step. And this is a minor loss if the initial amount was 3% of the Bank.
Once we win the bet, the cycle ends and we go back to the original bet size.
As a rule, 4 iterations are enough to get a win, as we have events with coefficients no higher than 4. In this case, we will get such a deal:
1 bet-loss
2 bet-loss
3 bet-loss
4 bet-win
Let's say the final bet played with a coefficient of 3.5. In this case, we bet 40 rubles and won 140 rubles. Subtract from this value the previously set amount and get:
140 - 40 – 30- 20 - 10 = 40 rubles.
So we have put a 100 and got 40. Our profit was 40%. This is a very good indicator. If the coefficient on the last bet was 3, then the profit would be 20%, which is also good.
The advantage of this technique is that in the first 5 steps we make a profit. And on the following we will get the minimum loss, which is easily won back by the following bets.
The disadvantage of d'alembert's betting strategy is that there is a possibility of losing a small amount of money.
Counter-d'alembert system
The essence of this technique is that if you win the next bet increases by 1 unit, and if you lose – it decreases. If you lose the first bet, the size of the next one remains the same. This technique is good when the player wins at least 40% of bets.
The positive quality of this technique is the fact that in a series of losses bettor does not increase the size of the bet.
The disadvantage of the counter-Dalembert system is that it will not be possible to recoup in a short time after a series of 4-5 lost bets.
Summary
To check the effectiveness of each of the presented methods, some bettors act as follows. They divide the Bank for each strategy and put separately. After many bets, they compare the income and choose the most effective way for further use.
