Page 1 of 2
Star Wars vs. Star Trek
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:00 pm
by agatha10
I think star wars kicks star trek's ass, as well as dune, like i said on the episode 3 board.
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:12 pm
by Fleek
there should be 3 options...
star wars
star trek
neither
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 4:23 pm
by Fettuccine_Alfredo
All right now how does one find an answer to this hard question.
Now i am a trekie yet i am very partial to star wars now i would have to say star wars and now i love both star wars is the best as a metter of fact i am getting the rebel alliance symbol tatt on my arm and mabey the klingon symbol on the other...
so i love both but star wars more.
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 10:27 pm
by SPOONER
star trek is too watered down. there is no need for that many movies and tv shows, its all the same...
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:31 am
by =^-..-^=
Star Trek for story lines and a little depth.
Star Wars for action and Special Effects.
Baylon 5 and Farscape were much better than Trek. The more science fiction I read in books, the less I like Star Trek, though. It's like entry-level science fiction, and the main characters are all too squeaky-clean.
Of course, PBS needs to get off their arse and run Red Dwarf again!
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:35 am
by sharkmansix
I'm gonna go with Dr. Who. No special effects, lame story and plot, but the mother-jerk travels around is a super cool ship that on the outside looks like a phone booth.
And he has a robot dog.
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 6:04 pm
by Bjart Sod
Haha, I bought my mom an action figure of K-9 when I was in London. always prefered the television version of Hitchhiker's Guide to Dr. Who, mostly because the pace is quicker. And you can't beat Peter Jones as The Book.
My geekiest day in college came during my multicultural literature symposium. The professor tried to compare something or other to the Prime Directive from Star Trek. I was the only one in class who knew what she was talking about, so I had to explain it to everyone.
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 12:18 am
by SPOONER
thats sad. i'm lucky that never happened to me, cept one of my teachers misquoted pink floyd so i had to step in. thats the only situation i came close to
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2004 9:42 am
by HillgrassBluebillyFTW
come on... the light saber would destroy the phaser any day.
And the millenium falcon would run right through the enterprise.
and I'd rather be on a death star than deep space 9.
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2004 10:17 am
by jedi
maybe if captain kirk had the force he could get over that studdering problem...
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:37 pm
by sharkmansix
And the millenium falcon would run right through the enterprise.
The Millineum Falcon is the size of a tennis-ball in comparison to the Enterprize. The Enterprize has city's worth of people on it. The Millenium Falcon could barely hold 6 plus some damn droids!
The Millineum Falcon would fly off the Enterprize's hull like a super-bouncy ball!
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2004 5:04 pm
by Bjart Sod
To play devil's advocate, the Millenium Falcon was a smuggling vessel...
On the other hand, Harlan Ellison wrote an episode of Star Trek...
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2004 1:59 am
by SPOONER
but Millenium Falcon is a killer name; deep space 9 sounds like a really bad porno name. anywhoo, star wars you could actually laugh w/. star trek is just rediculous.
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:48 am
by Shrugie
Conan O'brien does the best impression of a Star Trek fan ever!
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:49 am
by HillgrassBluebillyFTW
sharkmansix wrote:And the millenium falcon would run right through the enterprise.
The Millineum Falcon is the size of a tennis-ball in comparison to the Enterprize. The Enterprize has city's worth of people on it. The Millenium Falcon could barely hold 6 plus some damn droids!
The Millineum Falcon would fly off the Enterprize's hull like a super-bouncy ball!
So maybe it would run through that shaft that holds the engine on?