Page 1 of 1

Spider Man 3

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 1:25 pm
by boxcarbooks
Vote: Was this the worst movie ever made?


Despite Venom, I still vote yes.

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 1:54 pm
by MrSpall
If you think this is the worst movie ever made, you've clearly never seen the Screech porn.

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 1:55 pm
by The_Dude
...or Freddy Got Fingered.

Re: Spider Man 3

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 1:58 pm
by Aero
boxcarbooks wrote:Vote: Was this the worst movie ever made?


Despite Venom, I still vote yes.
No, I can't believe everyone has jumped on the bandwagon saying this is terrible. The fighting scenes were awesome.

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 10:29 pm
by Jennifer Burley
I actually thought Spiderman 3 was really good.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 8:56 am
by Krieves
I haven't seen Spiderman 3 yet, but it has to be better than BioDome.

Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 12:20 pm
by rdhotjillypepper
I thought it was an okay movie. It wasn't as great as I expected but it certainly wasn't terrible. Yes it had its dumb parts, but oh well. I'm just tired of everyone going "OMG IT WAS THE WORST MOVIE I"VE EVER SEEN!!!@@!@!"

Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 3:10 pm
by deek
Krieves wrote:I haven't seen Spiderman 3 yet, but it has to be better than BioDome.
Ummm...BioDome was probably the greatest movie ever made...how dare you compare SM3 to something that should never be in a comparison...

Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 11:18 pm
by =^-..-^=
I just saw Spidey 3 tonight and I thought it was awesome. Great effects, good story, and lotsa action.

Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 5:52 am
by Sankofa
MrSpall wrote:If you think this is the worst movie ever made, you've clearly never seen any other movies.

Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 11:26 am
by The Afronaut
Crap.

Man oh man. Pringz and Glide warned me, but I honestly thought they HAD to be exaggerating. Even though the movie was like 2 1/2 hours I felt like they rushed stuff...and that wouldnt have been a problem if they'd just cut some of the cutesy stuff...how long was that ring bit w/ Bruce Cambell? How long was the "Saturday Night Fever" omage? How long was that COMPLETELY unecessary dance sequence? ...And meanwhile the audience gets absolutely NO explanation of where the hell the symbiote comes from...NO explanation as to why Peter cant take it off, why he decides to go to a church to finally get rid of it...why nobody bothered to look for a body when Flint Marko becomes the Sandman...where the hell the Osborne butler who apparantly knows EVERYTHING even f-ing comes from! ARRRGGHH! Cats changing all kinds of stuff for no damn reason! What difference does it make to the story if the Sandman killed Uncle Ben?!? It doesnt help sh*t! Whatever...I could blabber about this for hours...but yeah. I didnt like the movie. The dialouge was cheesy as hell this time around too even for a comic book movie. Bad Spidey? Yeah right dude sounded weak as hell!

Now people are saying they wanna see Carnage. What?!? If they do a Spiderman 4 NO CARNAGE!!! Do Venom some effing justice before you throw Cassidy in there...PLUS...the one thing theyve done good the entire franchise they still have yet to cash in on! Curt Conners has been in EVERY MOVIE! Turn him into the damn lizard already! Geez!

-Wise.

Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 5:06 pm
by QWETTY
it sucked... i went to the first showing... poop and the entire theater agreed. fight scenes were good but the fact that they started like 40 story lines and didn't finish any of them is ridiculous. Eric foreman as venom? come on now.

the writing ruined this movie plain and simple.

Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:45 pm
by boxcarbooks
The Afronaut wrote:Pure forking wisdom.

Thank you for your truth.
No, I can't believe everyone has jumped on the bandwagon saying this is terrible.
Besides my girlfriend, I'm the only other person I've ever talked to that's seen it. What bandwagon are you talking about, dork?
The fighting scenes were awesome.
Wait till you're in your 20s when you care about story, plot, dialog, character, and other grown up stuff. I could have come up with that tacky-assed dialog. Plot? The characters were weak as hell, except Sandman, who they still didn't give enough time to.

"Oh you embarassed me, Peter Parker! Now I'm Venom! RARRRRRR!"

Worst movie ever.

Why? Because it had soOOOOOOoooOOOo much potential. SQUANDERED!

Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 8:07 pm
by poopstains
All and all I thought it was decent. It was drawn out at parts, but when your introducing four new characters it takes time to set them up and give them a little background. They still could have cut about 30 minutes out of it and made it better, it seemed like it didn't flow well. Gwen Staci was pointless they had plenty of other devices to pull Peter and Mary Jane apart. The venom portioned seemed rushed.